SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Patricia E. Hartman

Last decided DenverSep 2017
Decisions 492since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Understanding how a judge's approval rate compares to their peers provides helpful context for your hearing. The data below tracks decisions made since January 2016, offering a view of the judge's historical pattern against the broader bench at the Denver office. Because SSA assigns cases through a random workload-balancing algorithm, these figures represent a probability cloud rather than a guaranteed outcome.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 47%
Decisions on record 492

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Hartman. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 29, 2017. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Hartman's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Hartman
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY17
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Patricia E. Hartman has remained steady throughout the period of available data. Starting with a 47% approval rate in 2016 across 482 decisions, the rate shifted to 45% in 2017. With 492 total decisions on record since January 2016, the consistency in these figures suggests a stable approach to case evaluation.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Hartman's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Denver hearing office

Patricia E. Hartman's most recent office on record is the Denver hearing office, which serves you if you are in the region. This office is home to 22 judges whose most recent records are based there. You can expect a formal process where the quality of your medical documentation is the primary factor in your decision.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Denver

SSA assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 22 judges whose most recent office on record is the Denver office, with approval rates ranging from 31% to 75% on their since-2016 records. Because each judge has a unique approach to evaluating medical evidence and vocational testimony, understanding the office-wide bench is useful.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions