SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Patricia E. Hartman

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Denver Hearing Office · 2 years on the bench · 3,435 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Hartman?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Hartman's approval rate is measured against the broader context of the Denver Hearing Office and national standards. While the office maintains an approval rate of 62%, Judge Hartman's lifetime performance reflects a rate of 47%. These figures are derived from a docket of 3,435 lifetime decisions, providing a statistical baseline. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Hartman Denver National
Approval rate 47% 62% 58%
Fully favorable 40%
Denials 53%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Hartman's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Hartman
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY17
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a two-year tenure, Judge Hartman's decision-making has remained consistent. Starting with a 48% approval rate in 2016, the trend shifted to 45% in 2017. This pattern reflects a steady approach to evaluating your disability claim within the Denver jurisdiction. The judge's current approval rate is 15 percentage points below the office average, a trend that may reflect variations in case complexity or the medical evidence presented in your file.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Hartman's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Hartman? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Denver hearing office

The Denver Hearing Office serves a wide population across Colorado, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office operates under the broader SSA guidelines for administrative hearings. You can expect a formal process focused on the medical and vocational evidence supporting your claim. You can visit the Denver Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning you cannot choose your judge. Within the Denver Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 45% to 62%. This variance highlights why the specific judge assigned to your case is only one factor in your overall strategy. You can find more information on the office's general operations on the Denver Hearing Office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions