SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Kevin R. Himebaugh

Last decided Grand RapidsJul 2026
Decisions 3,588since 2017

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. Kevin R. Himebaugh's 60% approval rate since 2017 provides a broad view of his decision history, while his latest-period rate of 64% shows how he compares to the office average of 60%. With 3,588 decisions on record, the data offers a stable look at his past activity. These figures reflect historical trends rather than the outcome of your specific hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 60%
Decisions on record 3,588
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Himebaugh Grand Rapids National
Approval rate 64% 60% 58%
Fully favorable 54% — —
Denials 36% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Himebaugh's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Himebaugh
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since December 2017, Kevin R. Himebaugh has issued 3,588 decisions. His yearly approval trend shows fluctuations, with a notable increase in recent years compared to the 2019-2021 period. The latest reporting period shows a 64% approval rate, which is 4 points higher than the office average for the same timeframe. This recent activity reflects a continuation of a pattern where approval rates have remained steady or trended upward.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Himebaugh's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Grand Rapids hearing office

The Grand Rapids hearing office serves you and other claimants across the region. This office features a bench of 10 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 60%. You can expect a formal administrative process where evidence quality is the primary factor in your decision. You can see the Grand Rapids Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Grand Rapids

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 10 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with 6 of them having decided cases in the latest file. Approval rates for this bench range from 43% to 88% on their records since 2016. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions