SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Richard Horowitz

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Toledo OH Hearing Office · 4 years on the bench · 9,983 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Horowitz?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance requires looking at both their career-long history and recent trends. Judge Horowitz has maintained a lifetime approval rate of 45% across 9,983 decisions. This figure sits below the latest office average of 53% and the national average of 58%. These numbers provide a statistical baseline for understanding the judge's history, though they do not predict the outcome of your specific hearing.

Metric Judge Horowitz Toledo OH National
Approval rate 45% 53% 58%
Fully favorable 38%
Denials 55%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Horowitz's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Horowitz
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over 4 years on the bench, the approval rate for Judge Horowitz has shown fluctuations. The annual data indicates a peak of 54% in 2017, followed by 46% in 2018 and 42% in 2019. This variance suggests that your outcome is sensitive to the specific evidence and case mix presented. The latest period reflects a shift from the higher approval rates seen earlier in the judge's tenure.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Horowitz's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Horowitz? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Toledo OH hearing office

The Toledo OH Hearing Office serves a significant population across Ohio. With 6 judges on the bench, the office maintains an average approval rate of 53%. You can expect a formal administrative process where the quality of your medical evidence is the primary factor in a favorable decision. You can visit the Toledo OH Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the Toledo OH Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges range from 44% to 51%. While these differences exist, the core requirements for proving disability remain consistent across the entire bench.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions