SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Richard J. Kallsnick

Last decided TulsaSep 2016
Decisions 303since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rate for Richard J. Kallsnick is based on 303 decisions on record since 2016. When evaluating this figure, compare it against the broader bench at the Tulsa hearing office, where approval rates for judges with records since 2016 range from 37% to 81%. This range provides context for how different adjudicators have approached their dockets. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 62%
Decisions on record 303

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Kallsnick. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 30, 2016. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Kallsnick's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Kallsnick
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The data for Richard J. Kallsnick covers 303 decisions on record starting in 2016. During this period, the approval rate was 62%. Because this record reflects a specific window of activity, it provides a consistent view of past decision-making patterns. This stability helps you understand the historical context of your hearing.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Kallsnick's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Tulsa hearing office

Richard J. Kallsnick's most recent office on record is the Tulsa hearing office, with decisions there through September 2016. This office serves claimants in the Oklahoma region and maintains a bench of 15 judges. You can generally expect a standard hearing process focused on the medical and vocational evidence presented in your file. You can see the Tulsa hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Tulsa

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 15 judges whose most recent office on record is the Tulsa hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 37% to 81%. This variation across the bench highlights why preparation is vital regardless of the specific judge assigned to your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions