SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Richard J. Kallsnick

SSA Administrative Law Judge with the Tulsa · 1 years on the bench · 2,249 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's approval rate to office and national benchmarks helps provide context for your upcoming hearing. Judge Kallsnick currently holds a 61% lifetime approval rate, which is 3 percentage points higher than the national average of 58% but slightly below the latest Tulsa office average of 64%. These figures are derived from a significant docket of 2,249 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Metric Judge Kallsnick Tulsa National
Approval rate 61% 63% 58%
Fully favorable 52%
Denials 39%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Kallsnick's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Kallsnick
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Throughout his 1 year on the bench, Judge Kallsnick has maintained a steady approval pattern. With 2,249 lifetime decisions, the data reflects a consistent approach to evaluating your disability claim. His career history shows stability across his time in the Tulsa office, where his approval rates have remained within a narrow margin. This trend suggests a predictable approach to evidence evaluation, and the latest period reflects a continuation of this steady pattern.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Kallsnick's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the Tulsa Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench vary significantly, ranging from 38% to 80%. Because each judge brings a unique perspective to the courtroom, understanding the office-wide environment is helpful. You can find more information on the Tulsa hearing office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions