SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Timothy G. Keller

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 1,889 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Evaluating a judge's record requires looking at the full scope of their activity rather than isolated outcomes. Timothy G. Keller has maintained a consistent record over 1,889 lifetime decisions, which allows for a clear view of his decision-making patterns compared to the 34% to 83% lifetime approval range seen across the Columbus bench. These figures provide a statistical baseline for your hearing preparation.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 44%
Decisions on record 1,889

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Keller. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 30, 2022. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Keller's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Keller
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY22
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Timothy G. Keller has presided over 1,889 lifetime decisions. His approval rate has fluctuated over this period, with 44% in 2016, 47% in 2017, 34% in 2018, 33% in 2019, 56% in 2020, 51% in 2021, and 36% in 2022. This pattern suggests that the approach to evidence and case requirements may evolve in response to changing caseloads or regulatory guidance. Understanding these historical trends helps you focus on the specific medical evidence most relevant to this judge's bench.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Keller's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Columbus hearing office

The Columbus hearing office serves you throughout the region, providing a central venue for disability hearings. With 17 judges on record, the office manages a diverse caseload and maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 63%. You can expect a formal process where the quality of your medical documentation remains the primary factor in a successful outcome. You can see the Columbus Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. There are 17 judges on record at this office since 2016, 6 of whom reported in SSA's latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 34% to 83% on a lifetime basis.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions