For law firms Join the ClaimsBoost partner network
SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. William J. King Jr.

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Nhc Chicago Hearing Office · 5 years on the bench · 6,367 lifetime decisions

Check My Benefits →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge King maintains a lifetime approval rate of 58%, a figure derived from 6,367 lifetime decisions during his 5-year tenure. In the most recent reporting period, his approval rate sits at 58%, which is 7 percentage points above the NHC Chicago office average and 2 percentage points above the state average. These metrics provide a baseline for understanding how his courtroom has historically processed disability claims.

Metric Judge King Jr. Nhc Chicago National
Approval rate 58% 51% 58%
Fully favorable 49%
Denials 42%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge King Jr.'s docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge King Jr.
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY21
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over his 5 years on the bench, Judge King has seen his approval rate fluctuate, starting at 74% in 2017 and shifting to 45% in 2021. This trend shows a transition from higher initial approval rates toward a more conservative pattern in recent years. The latest period reflects a departure from his earlier, higher-volume years, potentially due to changes in case complexity or evidence requirements.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge King Jr.'s bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge King? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Check My Benefits
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Nhc Chicago hearing office

The NHC Chicago Hearing Office serves a large population across Illinois, managing a high volume of disability claims with a bench of 6 judges. The office currently maintains an average approval rate of 51%. You can expect a standard administrative process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can visit the NHC Chicago Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The SSA assigns cases to judges using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to Judge King is essentially random. Within the NHC Chicago office, lifetime approval rates among the bench vary significantly, ranging from 41% to 69%. This variance highlights why preparation is vital regardless of who hears your case.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Check My Benefits

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions