SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Dennis R. Kramer

On record 807 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rate for Judge Kramer is based on 807 lifetime decisions recorded between 2016 and 2018. This figure sits at the high end of the 42% to 83% lifetime approval range observed among the 11 judges who have served at the Valparaiso IN office. Comparing these lifetime figures provides a clearer picture of judicial tendencies than short-term fluctuations. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 83%
Decisions on record 807

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Kramer. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 28, 2018. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Kramer's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Kramer
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY18
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Judge Kramer's record shows an approval rate that remained consistent through 2016 and 2017 before a decline in the limited data from 2018. With 807 lifetime decisions analyzed since 2016, the data captures a clear period of activity. While the early years of this window reflect a high rate of allowances, the final months of the record show a change in volume and approval frequency. This shift may reflect changes in case mix or evidence quality during the final phase of his recorded tenure.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Kramer's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Valparaiso IN hearing office

The Valparaiso IN hearing office serves you and other claimants throughout the region, managing a bench of 11 judges on record. You can expect a standard administrative hearing process where the focus remains on your medical documentation and vocational testimony. The office maintains a consistent approach to evaluating disability claims in accordance with Social Security Administration guidelines. You can view the Valparaiso IN hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. There are 11 judges on record at this office since 2016, with lifetime approval rates varying from 42% to 83%. Because every judge evaluates evidence differently, understanding the range of outcomes at your local office is a helpful step in your preparation. The guidance for your hearing remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions