SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Barry C. LaBoda

Last decided OrlandoSep 2020
Decisions 1,600since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rate for Barry C. LaBoda is based on 1,600 decisions recorded between 2016 and 2020. This figure provides a statistical look at past outcomes within the Orlando Hearing Office. When reviewing these numbers, it is helpful to compare them against the range of other judges who have decided cases at this office. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 89%
Decisions on record 1,600

Judge LaBoda is not in SSA's latest disposition file, so there is no 12-month figure. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 25, 2020. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Judge LaBoda isn't in SSA's latest disposition file, so the judge comparison tool, which compares active judges over the same 12 months, leaves them out.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge LaBoda's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge LaBoda
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY20
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Barry C. LaBoda's record spans 1,600 decisions from 2016 through 2020. During this period, the approval rate remained consistent, starting at 88% in 2016 and reaching 90% by 2020. This data reflects a steady pattern of decisions throughout the time Barry C. LaBoda was on record at the Orlando office.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge LaBoda's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Orlando hearing office

The Orlando Hearing Office serves you across Florida and the surrounding region. This office has seen 17 judges with records of decisions on file since 2016. You can expect a standard administrative hearing process designed to evaluate the medical and vocational evidence in your file. You can see the Orlando Hearing Office page for the full roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Orlando

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Approval rates vary across the bench at the Orlando Hearing Office. The 8 judges who decided cases here in SSA's latest file range from 34% to 62% on their since-2016 records. There are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions