SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Elizabeth A. Lardaro

Last decided South JerseyJul 2026
Decisions 2,409since 2017

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing Elizabeth A. Lardaro's performance requires looking at consistent reporting periods. While the overall approval rate since 2017 is 60%, recent data shows a 66% approval rate in the latest reporting period. This latest figure sits 3 percentage points below the South Jersey office average of 69%, but 8 percentage points above the national average of 58%. These figures are based on a significant volume of cases, providing a stable statistical baseline.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 60%
Decisions on record 2,409
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Lardaro South Jersey National
Approval rate 66% 69% 58%
Fully favorable 57% — —
Denials 34% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Lardaro's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Lardaro
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Elizabeth A. Lardaro's approval rate has shown fluctuation across the 2,409 decisions on record since 2017. Following a period of lower approval rates around 2019 and 2021, the trend has stabilized, with the most recent fiscal year-to-date data showing an approval rate of 66%. This recent uptick reflects a shift from the long-term average, suggesting that your current case mix or evidentiary standards may be evolving.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Lardaro's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the South Jersey hearing office

The South Jersey hearing office serves you throughout the region, operating as a critical hub for disability adjudications. With 13 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, the office maintains a collective latest-period approval rate of 69%. You should be prepared for a rigorous review of your medical evidence, as the office bench shows significant variance in decision outcomes.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is South Jersey

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 13 judges whose most recent office on record is the South Jersey office, and 8 of them decided cases here in SSA's latest file. Approval rates for this bench range from 50% to 93% on their records since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions