SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Gary J. Lee

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Honolulu Hearing Office · 3 years on the bench · 6,220 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Lee?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Lee maintains an approval rate that outperforms broader benchmarks. In the latest reporting period, his approval rate was 14 percentage points higher than the Honolulu Hearing Office average and 24 percentage points higher than the national average of 58%. These figures are derived from a volume of 6,220 lifetime decisions, providing a stable statistical baseline. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Lee Honolulu National
Approval rate 82% 68% 58%
Fully favorable 70%
Denials 18%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Lee's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Lee
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY18
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over his 3 years on the bench, Judge Lee has demonstrated an upward trend in approval rates. Starting at 79% in 2016, the rate climbed to 82% in 2017 and reached 87% in 2018. This pattern indicates a consistent approach to evaluating evidence throughout his tenure. The data suggests that his decision-making process remains stable as he manages his caseload.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Lee's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Lee? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Honolulu hearing office

The Honolulu Hearing Office serves claimants throughout Hawaii. With a bench of 5 judges, the office maintains an environment where approval rates vary between individual ALJs. If you are scheduled here, focus on gathering comprehensive medical evidence to support your specific impairment claims. You can see the Honolulu Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The SSA assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is random. Across the Honolulu Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the 5 judges range from 48% to 82%. While these variations exist, the fundamental requirements for proving your disability remain consistent regardless of which judge presides. You can find more information on the Honolulu Hearing Office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions