SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Jesse J. Pease

On record 2,827 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. While Jesse J. Pease maintains a 63% lifetime approval rate, his latest-period performance shows a 67% approval rate, which aligns with the current Reno office average. Across the office's bench, lifetime approval rates range from 27% to 63%, highlighting the importance of case preparation. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 63%
Decisions on record 2,827
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Pease Reno National
Approval rate 67% 67% 58%
Fully favorable 58%
Denials 33%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Pease's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Pease
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for Jesse J. Pease spans 2,827 decisions starting in 2016. His approval trend has remained steady, showing a gradual increase from 56% in 2016 to 67% in the most recent reporting period. This consistency suggests a stable approach to evaluating evidence. The latest period reflects a continuation of this pattern, indicating that the judge's decision-making process has remained reliable over the last decade.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Pease's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Reno hearing office

The Reno hearing office serves you throughout Nevada and parts of the surrounding region. With 7 judges on record, the office maintains a latest-period approval rate of 67%. You can expect a professional environment focused on the specific medical and vocational evidence presented in your file. You can see the Reno Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 7 judges on record at this office since 2016. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 27% to 63% on a lifetime basis. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions