SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. James Linehan

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,209 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rate for James Linehan is based on 3,209 lifetime decisions recorded between 2016 and 2023. This data provides a view of his decision-making history compared to the broader Oklahoma City office, where lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 45% to 85%. Understanding where a judge sits within this range helps you grasp the landscape of your upcoming hearing. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 55%
Decisions on record 3,209

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Linehan. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 29, 2023. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Linehan's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Linehan
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY23
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for James Linehan shows a shift in approval patterns over the last several years. While his approval rate hovered near 50% during the 2016 to 2020 period, the data indicates an upward trend in recent years, reaching 75% in 2023. This evolution suggests that the judge's approach to evidence or case volume has changed since the start of the data window in 2016.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Linehan's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Oklahoma City hearing office

The Oklahoma City hearing office serves you throughout the region, maintaining a bench of 17 judges on record. This office operates within a system where case assignment is randomized to ensure efficient processing of disability claims. You can expect a formal hearing environment where your evidence quality remains the primary driver of the outcome. You can see the Oklahoma City Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 17 judges on record at this office since 2016, 11 of whom are reported in the latest SSA period. Because approval rates across this bench vary from 45% to 85%, the specific judge assigned to your case is a factor in your hearing process.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions