SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Michael L. Harris

Last decided Oklahoma CityJul 2026
Decisions 4,095since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at the same time period to ensure a fair assessment. Over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, Michael L. Harris's 89% approval rate sits above the 72% office average, 68% state average, and 58% national average. These figures are derived from a docket of 418 decisions during this window. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Last 12 months July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Harris Oklahoma City National
Approval rate 89% 72% 58%
Fully favorable 84% — —
Denials 11% — —
Decisions 418 — —
All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 80%
Decisions on record 4,095

SSA publishes no office- or national-level breakdown of fully favorable and denial rates. The 12 months are SSA's figures for this fiscal year to date plus the rest of the previous fiscal year; how we calculate them.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Harris's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Harris
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Michael L. Harris has issued 4,095 decisions on record. The yearly trend shows a high rate of approval that has remained consistent over the last decade. While the approval rate was 74% in 2016, it has trended upward in recent years, reaching 88% in the partial 2026 fiscal year. The most recent 12 months sit above the 80% average recorded since 2016.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Harris's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Oklahoma City hearing office

Michael L. Harris's most recent office on record is the Oklahoma City Hearing Office, which serves you across Oklahoma. This office maintains a bench of 17 judges, 11 of whom decided cases in the most recent SSA file dated July 2026. The office recorded a 72% approval rate over the 12 months to July 31, 2026.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Oklahoma City

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Among the 11 judges who decided cases here in SSA's latest file, approval rates range from 53% to 89% over the 12 months to July 31, 2026. There are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, and 11 of them decided cases here in SSA's latest file.

Judges with similar approval rates

These active judges' approval rates over the same 12 months (July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026) are closest to Judge Harris's 89%. Two of them last decided cases in Oklahoma. With too few close matches there, the rest come from SSA's Dallas region.

Rates within 5 points of each other are hard to tell apart at a typical caseload, so treat these as judges with comparable records, not a ranking. See Judge Harris and the three closest side by side →

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions