SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Kim D. Parrish

Last decided Oklahoma CityJul 2026
Decisions 4,749since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates provides context on how a judge's decisions align with broader trends. Kim D. Parrish's 69% approval rate over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, is measured against the 72% office rate, 68% state rate, and 58% national rate for the same period. With 4,749 total decisions on record since 2016, the data offers a significant sample size for review.

Last 12 months July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Parrish Oklahoma City National
Approval rate 69% 72% 58%
Fully favorable 66% — —
Denials 31% — —
Decisions 455 — —
All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 63%
Decisions on record 4,749

SSA publishes no office- or national-level breakdown of fully favorable and denial rates. The 12 months are SSA's figures for this fiscal year to date plus the rest of the previous fiscal year; how we calculate them.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Parrish's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Parrish
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Kim D. Parrish has issued 4,749 decisions. The yearly trend shows fluctuations, with approval rates moving from 56% in 2016 to 69% in the most recent 12-month window. The data indicates that the most recent 12 months sit above the record since 2016, which stands at 63%.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Parrish's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Oklahoma City hearing office

The Oklahoma City hearing office serves you across Oklahoma and the surrounding region. As of the latest data from July 2026, this office maintains a bench of 17 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. The office recorded a 72% approval rate over the 12 months to July 31, 2026.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Oklahoma City

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Among the 11 judges who decided cases here in SSA's latest file, approval rates range from 53% to 89% over the 12 months to July 31, 2026. There are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is Oklahoma City, with 11 of them deciding cases in the latest file.

Judges with similar approval rates

These active judges' approval rates over the same 12 months (July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026) are closest to Judge Parrish's 69%. All five last decided cases in Oklahoma.

Rates within 5 points of each other are hard to tell apart at a typical caseload, so treat these as judges with comparable records, not a ranking. See Judge Parrish and the three closest side by side →

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions