SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. David A. Mason

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2026
Decisions 198 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing the record of David A. Mason requires looking at both his lifetime performance and his most recent activity. His 63% lifetime approval rate sits within the broader 44% to 74% range observed across the Livonia MI bench. In the latest reporting period, he maintained a 63% approval rate, which is 5 percentage points higher than the office-wide average of 58%. These figures reflect historical trends rather than individual case outcomes.

Lifetime SSA records since 2026
Approval rate 63%
Decisions on record 198
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Mason Livonia MI National
Approval rate 63% 58% 58%
Fully favorable 41%
Denials 37%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Mason's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Mason
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

David A. Mason has presided over 198 lifetime decisions. His approval rate has remained consistent at 63% throughout the latest reporting period. This data reflects a steady decision-making pattern, with a 41% fully-favorable rate and a 37% denial rate in recent months. This consistency provides a stable baseline for understanding how your evidence is evaluated in disability claims.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Mason's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Livonia MI hearing office

The Livonia MI hearing office serves claimants throughout the region, maintaining a bench of 18 judges on record. The office currently reports an average approval rate of 58% for the latest period. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. There are 18 judges on record at this office, 8 of whom reported in the latest period. Approval rates across these peers vary from 44% to 74%, highlighting the importance of a well-prepared case regardless of the judge assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions