SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Laura G. McHenry

Last decided ChattanoogaJul 2026
Decisions 2,390since 2017

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates provides context for how a judge's decisions align with broader trends. Over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, Judge McHenry's 89% approval rate is measured against the 69% office average, 57% state average, and 58% national average. These figures are based on a significant volume of decisions, providing a look at past activity. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Last 12 months July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026
Metric Judge McHenry Chattanooga National
Approval rate 89% 69% 58%
Fully favorable 85% — —
Denials 11% — —
Decisions 374 — —
All decisions on record SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 82%
Decisions on record 2,390

SSA publishes no office- or national-level breakdown of fully favorable and denial rates. The 12 months are SSA's figures for this fiscal year to date plus the rest of the previous fiscal year; how we calculate them.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge McHenry's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge McHenry
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since December 2017, Judge McHenry has issued 2,390 decisions. The yearly trend shows a period of growth in approval rates, moving from 64% in 2018 to 87% in 2020, before maintaining a consistent level of activity in recent years. The most recent 12 months sit above the 82% approval rate recorded since 2017.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge McHenry's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Chattanooga hearing office

The Chattanooga hearing office serves you and other claimants across Tennessee and the surrounding region. There are 16 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, with 7 of them having decided cases in SSA's latest file as of July 2026. The office maintained a 69% approval rate over the 12 months to July 31, 2026.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Chattanooga

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Among the 16 judges whose most recent office on record is Chattanooga, 7 decided cases here in SSA's latest file and range from 53% to 89% over the 12 months to July 31, 2026. For your preparation, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Judges with similar approval rates

These active judges' approval rates over the same 12 months (July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026) are closest to Judge McHenry's 89%. One of them last decided cases in Tennessee. With too few close matches there, the rest come from SSA's Atlanta region.

Rates within 5 points of each other are hard to tell apart at a typical caseload, so treat these as judges with comparable records, not a ranking. See Judge McHenry and the three closest side by side →

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions