SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Laura G. McHenry

On record 2,390 decisions since 2017

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes to ensure accuracy. While Laura G. McHenry maintains an 82% lifetime approval rate, her latest-period performance shows an 86% approval rate, which stands 18 points above the current 68% average for the Chattanooga hearing office. These figures are derived from a docket of 2,390 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Lifetime SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 82%
Decisions on record 2,390
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge McHenry Chattanooga National
Approval rate 86% 68% 58%
Fully favorable 84%
Denials 14%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge McHenry's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge McHenry
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval trend for Laura G. McHenry has shown a consistent pattern since 2017. The rate has remained strong, with the most recent data showing an 86% approval rate in the latest reporting period. This latest figure reflects a continuation of a steady, high-approval pattern observed over the last several years. The data suggests a stable approach to case evaluation, though individual outcomes always depend on the specific medical evidence presented in your case.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge McHenry's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Chattanooga hearing office

The Chattanooga hearing office serves claimants across the region, operating as a hub for SSDI hearings in Tennessee. The office maintains a latest-period approval rate of 68%, reflecting the broader environment in which these cases are decided. You can see the Chattanooga hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

SSA assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 16 judges on record at this office since 2016, 7 of whom reported in the SSA's latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 42% to 82% on lifetime records. You can review the office's full roster on the Chattanooga hearing office page.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions