SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Ruxana Meyer

On record 3,006 decisions since 2017

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. While Ruxana Meyer has a 61% lifetime approval rate, her latest-period performance shows a 74% approval rate, which is 6 points higher than the 68% office-wide latest-period average. These figures are derived from 3,006 lifetime decisions, providing a reliable statistical foundation. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 61%
Decisions on record 3,006
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Meyer Honolulu National
Approval rate 74% 68% 58%
Fully favorable 58%
Denials 26%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Meyer's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Meyer
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Ruxana Meyer's approval record has shown an upward trend since 2017, moving from 33% to 74% in the most recent reporting period. This shift reflects an evolution in how cases are evaluated over the 3,006 total decisions on record. While the latest period shows a higher approval frequency than the lifetime average, the overall pattern reflects a consistent trajectory.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Meyer's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Honolulu hearing office

The Honolulu hearing office serves you throughout Hawaii and the surrounding region. This office maintains a bench of 4 judges on record, with an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 68%. You can expect a standard administrative hearing process focused on your medical and vocational evidence. See the /disability-benefits/hearing-offices/honolulu-HI Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. There are 4 judges on record at this office since 2016. Approval rates across this bench range from 61% to 83% on a lifetime basis. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions