SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. John R. Montgomery

Last decided ColumbusSep 2016
Decisions 81since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

When evaluating your hearing, it is helpful to compare a judge's performance against the broader bench. The 17 judges whose most recent office on record is the Columbus hearing office show a wide range of approval rates, spanning from 34% to 83% based on their records since 2016. With 81 decisions on record, John R. Montgomery provides a clear data window for your review. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 51%
Decisions on record 81

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Montgomery. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 30, 2016. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Montgomery's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Montgomery
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The 51% approval rate for John R. Montgomery is based on 81 decisions recorded between January 2016 and September 2016. During this period, the data shows a steady pattern of decision-making. Because this record is limited to a single year, the approval rate reflects the outcomes of those specific cases. This pattern provides a baseline for understanding how the judge has historically approached disability claims.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Montgomery's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Columbus hearing office

The Columbus hearing office serves you throughout the region. This office has a bench of 17 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. You can expect a formal process where the quality of your medical evidence is the primary factor in the outcome. You can see the Columbus hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Columbus

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is the Columbus hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 34% to 83% on their records since 2016. While these figures vary, the requirements for proving your disability remain consistent. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions