SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Mary D. Morrow

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2017
Decisions 3,495 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. While the judge maintains a 44% lifetime approval rate, her latest-period performance shows a 45% approval rate, which sits 12 percentage points below the current 57% office-wide average. These figures are derived from a substantial docket of 3,495 lifetime decisions, providing a stable view of her historical pattern.

Lifetime SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 44%
Decisions on record 3,495
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Morrow Detroit National
Approval rate 45% 57% 58%
Fully favorable 33%
Denials 55%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Morrow's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Morrow
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The yearly trend for Mary D. Morrow shows fluctuations, with approval rates moving from 45% in 2018 to a peak of 54% in 2023, before shifting to 32% in 2025 and returning to 45% in 2026. This data, covering the period from 2017 to 2026, reflects a career spanning three different hearing offices. The most recent data suggests a return to her historical average after the volatility observed in 2025.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Morrow's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Detroit hearing office

The Detroit hearing office serves you throughout Michigan and is a key hub for regional disability adjudications. The office bench consists of 12 judges on record, maintaining a latest-period approval rate of 57%. You should expect a rigorous review of your medical documentation and vocational evidence. You can see the Detroit Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Detroit hearing office utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Across the 12 judges on record at this office since 2016, 9 are currently reporting in the latest SSA data. These judges demonstrate a wide variance in their lifetime approval rates, ranging from 25% to 75%.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions