SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Breinne A. Mullins

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2023
Decisions 908 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance requires looking at consistent data periods. While the lifetime approval rate of 59% provides a broad view of the judge's history, the latest-period data offers a more current snapshot. In the most recent reporting cycle, the judge maintained a 69% approval rate, which sits 7 points above the Charleston WV office average of 62%. These figures reflect historical trends rather than future outcomes.

Lifetime SSA records since 2023
Approval rate 59%
Decisions on record 908
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Mullins Charleston WV National
Approval rate 69% 62% 58%
Fully favorable 59%
Denials 31%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Mullins's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Mullins
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY23FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for Breinne A. Mullins spans from 2023 to 2026, encompassing 908 total decisions. The yearly trend shows fluctuation, with approval rates moving from 67% in 2023 to 53% in 2024, 50% in 2025, and 69% in 2026. This recent uptick reflects a shift in the judge's decision-making pattern compared to the previous two years. These variations are common and often reflect changes in the specific types of cases or evidence quality presented to the court.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Mullins's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Charleston WV hearing office

The Charleston WV hearing office serves claimants throughout the region, providing a venue for disability appeals. This office hosts a bench of 9 judges who collectively manage a diverse caseload. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 62%, reflecting the local environment for SSDI claims. For more details on the local bench, see the Charleston WV Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The SSA assigns cases to judges using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment is effectively random. There are 9 judges on record at this office since 2016, 3 of whom reported in the latest SSA period. The lifetime approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 39% to 78%. Understanding the office-wide environment can help you calibrate your expectations for the hearing process.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions