SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Cam Oetter

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Macon Hearing Office · 9 years on the bench · 16,375 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Oetter?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Oetter has issued 16,375 decisions during their 9-year tenure. Their lifetime approval rate of 39% is 9 percentage points lower than the Macon office average and 19 points below the national average. These figures reflect the judge's historical approach to evaluating disability claims. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Oetter Macon National
Approval rate 39% 48% 58%
Fully favorable 33%
Denials 61%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Oetter's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Oetter
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY24
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since taking the bench in 2016, Judge Oetter has navigated a fluctuating caseload. While the approval rate reached 50% in 2017, recent years have shown a more stable trend, with the 2023 approval rate at 37%. This pattern suggests a consistent application of evidence standards over the last several years. The latest data indicates that the judge's current approach remains aligned with their long-term historical average.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Oetter's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Oetter? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Macon hearing office

The Macon Hearing Office serves you across central Georgia, managing a high volume of disability cases. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an average approval rate that reflects the regional caseload and administrative standards. If you are scheduled here, prepare for a formal process focused on medical documentation and vocational evidence. You can see the Macon Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the Macon office, the 6 ALJs range from 30% to 65% in their lifetime approval rates. While these variations exist, the fundamental requirements for proving your disability remain consistent regardless of which judge presides.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions