SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. George Oetter

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2024
Decisions 540 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rate for George Oetter is based on 540 lifetime decisions, providing a clear view of historical trends at the Macon office. When evaluating your potential outcome, it is useful to compare this figure against the office-wide lifetime range of 31% to 72%. These statistics are derived from comprehensive SSA data to ensure accuracy for your planning. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2024
Approval rate 37%
Decisions on record 540

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Oetter. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 26, 2025. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Oetter's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Oetter
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY24FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since the record window opened in 2024, George Oetter has maintained a consistent approach to disability claims. The approval rate shifted from 35% in 2024 to 41% in 2025, reflecting a steady pattern in case evaluations. This trend suggests that the judge's decision-making process remains stable as the docket grows. The recent uptick may reflect changes in case mix or evidence quality presented in recent hearings.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Oetter's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Macon hearing office

The Macon hearing office serves claimants throughout the region, maintaining a diverse bench of 13 judges on record. With an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 46%, this location handles a high volume of disability claims. You can expect a formal process where evidence quality is the primary factor in a favorable decision. You can see the Macon Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The SSA uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 13 judges on record at this office since 2016, 7 of whom reported in the SSA's latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 31% to 72% over their respective careers. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions