SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Mike Oleyar

Last decided Wilkes BarreJul 2026
Decisions 2,455since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframes. While Mike Oleyar has a 48% approval rate across the total record since 2016, the latest-period performance shows a 51% approval rate, which sits 6 percentage points above the Wilkes Barre office average of 45% for the same period. These figures are derived from a volume of 2,455 decisions on record. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 48%
Decisions on record 2,455
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Oleyar Wilkes Barre National
Approval rate 51% 45% 58%
Fully favorable 40% — —
Denials 49% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Oleyar's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Oleyar
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since September 2016, Mike Oleyar has presided over 2,455 decisions. The approval rate has fluctuated over this period, showing a peak in 2023 at 69% before settling into 51% in the latest reporting period. This recent figure represents a deviation from the long-term average, though it remains within a range consistent with historical activity. The latest period reflects a continuation of this pattern, suggesting that case outcomes remain sensitive to the specific evidence you present in your hearing.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Oleyar's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Wilkes Barre hearing office

The Wilkes Barre hearing office is the most recent office on record for Mike Oleyar, with the last recorded decision there in July 2026. This office serves claimants across Pennsylvania and is part of a regional network tasked with processing disability appeals. With 13 judges on the bench, the office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 45%. You can expect a structured hearing process focused on your medical and vocational evidence.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Wilkes Barre

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the Wilkes Barre hearing office, there are 13 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, 11 of whom decided cases in the latest file through July 2026. These judges show a wide range of approval rates, spanning from 27% to 57% on their records since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions