SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Henry Oliver

Last decided Elkins ParkSep 2019
Decisions 1,028since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

This table displays the approval rate for Henry Oliver based on 1,028 decisions recorded between 2016 and 2019. These figures are compared against the range of other judges who decided cases at the Elkins Park office in the most recent SSA file. Because case assignment is random, understanding the broader bench performance provides helpful context. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 82%
Decisions on record 1,028

Judge Oliver is not in SSA's latest disposition file, so there is no 12-month figure. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 27, 2019. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Judge Oliver isn't in SSA's latest disposition file, so the judge comparison tool, which compares active judges over the same 12 months, leaves them out.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Oliver's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Oliver
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Henry Oliver decided 1,028 cases between 2016 and 2019. The annual approval rate was 90% in 2016, 77% in 2017, 80% in 2018, and 76% in 2019. These figures show the variation in the approval rate over the recorded period. The data reflects the outcomes of these specific years rather than a consistent trend.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Oliver's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Elkins Park hearing office

The Elkins Park Hearing Office serves you in Pennsylvania and the surrounding region. As of the most recent record in September 2019, this office maintained a bench of 24 judges. You can expect a standard administrative hearing process focused on the medical and vocational evidence presented in your file. You can see the Elkins Park Hearing Office page for the full roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Elkins Park

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Among the 24 judges whose most recent office on record is Elkins Park, 10 decided cases in the most recent SSA file and range from 50% to 72% on their records since 2016. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions