SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. William R. Paxton

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Charleston WV Hearing Office · 4 years on the bench · 6,522 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Paxton?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Paxton maintains a lifetime approval rate of 62%, which sits above the current Charleston WV office average of 59% and the national average of 58%. These figures are derived from a docket of 6,522 lifetime decisions. By comparing these metrics against state and national benchmarks, you can gain a clearer perspective on the local hearing environment. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Metric Judge Paxton Charleston WV National
Approval rate 62% 59% 58%
Fully favorable 53%
Denials 38%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Paxton's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Paxton
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over 4 years on the bench, Judge Paxton has demonstrated an upward trend in his approval rate. Starting at 52% in 2016, the rate climbed to 59% in 2017 and reached 64% during the 2018 and 2019 reporting periods. This progression suggests a consistent approach to evaluating evidence over the course of his tenure.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Paxton's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Paxton? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Charleston WV hearing office

The Charleston WV Hearing Office serves a broad population across West Virginia, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an average approval rate of 59%, reflecting the regional challenges and case complexities common to the area. You should be prepared for a thorough review of your medical and vocational evidence.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your specific judge is selected randomly. Within the Charleston WV office, lifetime approval rates among the bench vary significantly, ranging from 39% to 79%. This variance highlights why the specific judge assigned to your case is a meaningful factor in the hearing process.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions