SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Irving A. Pianin

Last decided NorfolkSep 2019
Decisions 1,405since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same time periods to ensure accuracy. The 49% approval rate for Irving A. Pianin reflects his entire record since 2016, which you can compare against the 48% to 60% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is also Norfolk. With 1,405 decisions analyzed, this data provides a stable look at past patterns. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 49%
Decisions on record 1,405

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Pianin. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 27, 2019. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Pianin's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Pianin
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Irving A. Pianin decided 1,405 cases between January 2016 and September 2019. His approval rate remained at 50% from 2016 through 2018, before shifting in the final months of his recorded activity. This pattern reflects the volume of cases handled during his time at the Norfolk office. The change in the final period may reflect shifts in case mix or evidence quality, but the long-term trend shows a consistent approach to evaluating your disability claim.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Pianin's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Norfolk hearing office

The Norfolk hearing office serves you and other claimants across the region, operating as part of the Social Security Administration's national network. With 12 judges having their most recent record at this location, it handles a significant volume of disability hearings. You can expect a formal process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can see the Norfolk hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Norfolk

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 12 judges whose most recent office on record is the Norfolk hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 48% to 60% on their records since 2016. Because each judge has a unique approach to evidence, understanding the local bench is helpful. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions