SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Daniel A. Piloseno Jr.

On record 2,853 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rates for Daniel A. Piloseno Jr. reflect a significant volume of cases heard since 2016. When evaluating these figures, compare them against the broader range of the Tampa OHO bench, which spans from 31% to 90% in lifetime approval rates. This statistical spread highlights why understanding your specific judge's history is a vital part of your hearing preparation. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 84%
Decisions on record 2,853

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Piloseno Jr.. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 29, 2023. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Piloseno Jr.'s docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Piloseno Jr.
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY23
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for Daniel A. Piloseno Jr. shows a consistent pattern of high approval rates across 2,853 decisions since 2016. Your yearly trend indicates a steady upward trajectory, moving from 76% in 2016 to 95% in 2023. This pattern suggests that the judge has maintained a high level of consistency in his approach to disability claims over the last several years.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Piloseno Jr.'s bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Tampa OHO hearing office

The Tampa OHO serves you and other claimants across Florida and the surrounding region. With a bench of 16 judges on record, this office manages a diverse caseload of disability applications. The office-wide latest approval rate is 59%, providing a baseline for the region. To learn more about the local administrative environment, see the Tampa OHO Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The SSA assigns cases to judges using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 16 judges on record at this office since 2016, 11 of whom reported in SSA's latest period. Because approval rates across this bench vary from 31% to 90%, your specific assignment can influence the context of your hearing. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions