SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. John Pope

Last decided NHC ChicagoSep 2019
Decisions 459since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

This table displays the approval rate for John Pope based on his 459 decisions on record since 2016. Because this judge is not in the most recent SSA file, this historical performance offers context for his decision-making patterns. The 19 judges whose most recent office on record is the NHC Chicago show a range of 26% to 63% approval on their records since 2016.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 40%
Decisions on record 459

Judge Pope is not in SSA's latest disposition file, so there is no 12-month figure. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 27, 2019. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Judge Pope isn't in SSA's latest disposition file, so the judge comparison tool, which compares active judges over the same 12 months, leaves them out.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Pope's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Pope
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

John Pope's approval rate shows a shift across the 459 decisions on record since 2016. The rate was 33% in 2016, 42% in 2017, and 41% in 2018. The limited data for 2019 reflects a partial period. This pattern shows his decision-making frequency across the years he was active at this office.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Pope's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the NHC Chicago hearing office

The NHC Chicago serves you if you are in Illinois and the surrounding region. This office maintains a bench of 19 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. If you appear before judges at this office, you should be prepared for a thorough review of your medical evidence and work history.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is NHC Chicago

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. At the NHC Chicago, there are 19 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. These judges show a wide variance in their approval rates, ranging from 26% to 63% on their records since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions