SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Mary F. Withum

Last decided NHC ChicagoSep 2016
Decisions 422since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

This table displays the approval rate for Mary F. Withum based on 422 decisions on record since 2016. The broader bench at NHC Chicago includes judges who range from 26% to 63% approval on their records since 2016. These figures provide a statistical view of past activity, though they do not serve as predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 43%
Decisions on record 422

Judge Withum is not in SSA's latest disposition file, so there is no 12-month figure. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 30, 2016. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Judge Withum isn't in SSA's latest disposition file, so the judge comparison tool, which compares active judges over the same 12 months, leaves them out.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Withum's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Withum
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Mary F. Withum stands at 43% across 422 decisions on record since 2016. This data window captures activity through September 2016. Because the record is limited to this period, the pattern reflects a single snapshot of decision-making that provides a baseline for how cases were historically handled at NHC Chicago.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Withum's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the NHC Chicago hearing office

NHC Chicago serves you if you are in Illinois and the surrounding region. This office has a bench of 19 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. You can expect a standard administrative hearing process focused on the medical and vocational evidence presented in your file. For more information, see the NHC Chicago hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is NHC Chicago

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Across NHC Chicago, there are 19 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. These judges show a wide range of approval rates, spanning from 26% to 63% on their records since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions