SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Deborah L. Rose

Last decided TulsaSep 2016
Decisions 365since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The 42% approval rate for Deborah L. Rose reflects 365 decisions on record since 2016. This can be measured against the 37% to 81% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is the Tulsa hearing office. These aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predicting the outcome of your specific hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 42%
Decisions on record 365

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Rose. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 30, 2016. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Rose's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Rose
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Deborah L. Rose is based on 365 decisions on record since 2016. During the 2016 data window, the rate was 42%. Because case assignment is random, this historical data serves as a baseline for understanding how the judge has approached past disability claims.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Rose's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Tulsa hearing office

Deborah L. Rose's most recent office on record is the Tulsa hearing office. This office is part of a larger network of hearing locations where 15 judges have their most recent record. You can expect a formal hearing process where the quality of your evidence is the primary factor in your decision.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Tulsa

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 15 judges whose most recent office on record is the Tulsa hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 37% to 81% on their since-2016 records.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions