SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. James H. Scott

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Charleston SC Hearing Office · 4 years on the bench · 6,229 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Scott?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Scott’s lifetime approval rate of 87% stands in contrast to the latest office average of 53% and the national average of 58%. These figures are derived from 6,229 lifetime decisions, providing a substantial data set for review. Comparing these rates helps you understand the broader context of your upcoming hearing. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Scott Charleston SC National
Approval rate 87% 53% 58%
Fully favorable 74%
Denials 13%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Scott's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Scott
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a 4-year tenure, Judge Scott has maintained a high approval rate, with yearly performance showing a steady pattern between 82% and 90%. The most recent data indicates that the judge's approval frequency remains significantly elevated compared to the broader office bench. This consistency suggests a stable approach to case evaluation throughout the judge's time on the bench.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Scott's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Scott? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Charleston SC hearing office

The Charleston SC Hearing Office serves you and other claimants across South Carolina, managing a high volume of disability hearings. With a bench of 6 judges, the office handles a diverse range of cases and maintains an office-wide latest approval rate of 53%. You can expect a professional environment where your medical documentation and vocational testimony are central to the proceedings. You can find more information on the Charleston SC Hearing Office page.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the Charleston SC office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 44% to 87%. Because you cannot choose your judge, it is important to focus on the strength of your medical evidence. The guidance for your preparation remains consistent regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions