James H. Scott is an ALJ at the Charleston SC hearing office. Across the 987 decisions on record since 2016, 87% have been approved. The office's 15 judges range from 17% to 87% on their lifetime records, and case assignment is random, so the judge you draw matters. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for your hearing.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
The approval rate for a judge provides a window into historical decision-making patterns. At the Charleston SC hearing office, lifetime approval rates among the bench vary significantly, ranging from 17% to 87%. This variation highlights why understanding your specific judge's record is a valuable part of your hearing preparation. These figures are based on 987 lifetime decisions, providing a sample size for analysis.
SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Scott. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 27, 2019. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Scott's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
James H. Scott has maintained a consistent record since 2016. The yearly trend shows high approval rates that remained steady throughout the recorded period, reflecting a stable approach to evaluating disability claims. With 987 lifetime decisions on record, the data indicates a clear pattern of outcomes that provides a baseline for understanding how cases have been handled in this courtroom.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Scott's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Reading this because a claim was denied? Decode the letter — what the sentence means, what to file, and by when.
About the Charleston SC hearing office
The Charleston SC hearing office serves you throughout the region, managing a diverse caseload of disability applications. The office bench consists of 15 judges on record, reflecting a range of experience and decision-making styles. You can expect a formal administrative process focused on the medical and vocational evidence presented in your file.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 15 judges on record at this office since 2016. Because approval rates across this bench range from 17% to 87%, the specific judge assigned to your case can influence the process.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
James H. Scott has a lifetime approval rate of 87%, which sits at the high end of the 17% to 87% range observed among the 15 judges on record at the Charleston SC office. While this rate is higher than many peers, your case is unique and depends on the specific evidence you provide. An attorney can help you prepare your case to meet the standards of this specific bench.
The data shows that James H. Scott has maintained a steady approval pattern since 2016. While yearly fluctuations occur, the overall trend remains consistent across the 987 lifetime decisions on record. An attorney can help you understand how these historical trends might relate to the current evidence in your file.
No, you cannot request a specific judge. The Social Security Administration uses a random, workload-based algorithm to assign cases to ensure efficiency and fairness. If you are concerned about your hearing, an attorney can help you prepare for the hearing process regardless of which judge is assigned.
An SSDI hearing is a non-adversarial proceeding where an ALJ reviews your medical records, vocational history, and testimony. You will likely be asked questions about your daily limitations and why you are unable to perform work. An attorney can help you prepare your testimony and ensure your medical evidence is organized for the judge.
A judge's approval rate is a statistical observation of past decisions, not a guarantee of how they will rule on your specific claim. Your success depends primarily on the strength of your medical evidence and how well you demonstrate your inability to work. An attorney can help you evaluate your case strengths and prepare for the specific requirements of your hearing.



