SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Larry D. Shepherd

Last decided Oklahoma CityJul 2026
Decisions 4,057since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes to understand how a judge's decisions align with their peers. While the office-wide bench shows a range of 45% to 85% in approval rates since 2016, Larry D. Shepherd has maintained a 46% approval rate over 4,057 total decisions. In the most recent reporting period, your judge's 51% approval rate sits 20 percentage points below the Oklahoma City office average of 71%.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 46%
Decisions on record 4,057
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Shepherd Oklahoma City National
Approval rate 51% 71% 58%
Fully favorable 49% — —
Denials 49% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Shepherd's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Shepherd
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval rate for Larry D. Shepherd has shown a gradual upward trend, moving from 44% in 2016 to 56% in 2025. The latest fiscal year-to-date data for 2026 shows a rate of 51% across 426 decisions. This pattern reflects a period of increasing approval frequency in recent years compared to the earlier part of the decade.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Shepherd's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Oklahoma City hearing office

The Oklahoma City hearing office serves you and other claimants across Oklahoma and the surrounding region. With 17 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, the office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 71%. You can expect a standard administrative hearing process where evidence quality remains the primary factor in your outcome.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Oklahoma City

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is the Oklahoma City office, 11 of whom decided cases in the latest SSA file. These judges show a wide range of approval rates, from 45% to 85% since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions