SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Maria L. Spitz

On record 816 decisions since 2023

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent periods to ensure accuracy. While the Greensboro office-wide lifetime approval range spans from 50% to 89%, Maria L. Spitz maintains a lifetime approval rate of 85% across 816 decisions. In the latest reporting period, she holds an 85% approval rate, which sits 20 points above the office-wide latest-period average of 65%. These figures reflect historical trends rather than specific outcomes for your case.

Lifetime SSA records since 2023
Approval rate 85%
Decisions on record 816
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Spitz Greensboro National
Approval rate 85% 65% 58%
Fully favorable 66%
Denials 15%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Spitz's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Spitz
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY24FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for Maria L. Spitz spans from 2023 to 2026, showing a consistent approval pattern. After an initial period, her approval rate has remained steady at 85% throughout the 2025 and 2026 reporting cycles. This stability suggests a predictable approach to case evaluation within her courtroom. The latest period reflects a 66% fully-favorable rate and a 15% denial rate.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Spitz's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Greensboro hearing office

The Greensboro hearing office serves you throughout the region, operating as a critical hub for disability adjudication in North Carolina. With a bench of 16 judges on record, the office maintains a latest-period approval rate of 65%. You can expect a formal hearing process focused on the medical and vocational evidence presented in your file. You can see the Greensboro Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 16 judges on record at this office since 2016, 8 of whom reported in the latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 50% to 89% over their respective careers. You can review the full office roster on the Greensboro hearing office page.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions