SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Michael J. Stacchini

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,297 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing Judge Stacchini's performance requires looking at consistent periods. While his lifetime approval rate sits at 60%, his latest-period approval rate of 62% provides a more current view of his decision-making. This latest figure is 14 percentage points lower than the Queens office average of 76%, while matching the New York state average of 62%. These figures are based on a substantial volume of cases, ensuring statistical confidence. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 60%
Decisions on record 3,297
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Stacchini Queens National
Approval rate 62% 76% 58%
Fully favorable 56%
Denials 38%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Stacchini's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Stacchini
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Judge Stacchini has maintained a consistent record since 2016. His approval rate has shown minor fluctuations over the years, ranging from a low of 51% in 2018 to a high of 65% in 2024. In the most recent reporting period, his 62% approval rate aligns closely with his long-term historical average. This steady pattern suggests a stable approach to evaluating evidence, with the latest period reflecting a continuation of his established decision-making trends.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Stacchini's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Queens hearing office

The Queens hearing office serves the New York region, managing a high volume of disability claims. With 11 judges on record, the office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 76%. You can expect a formal administrative process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can see the Queens hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 11 judges on record at the Queens office since 2016, 6 of whom reported in the latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, with lifetime records ranging from 49% to 85%. You can see the Queens hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions