SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Michael J. Stacchini

Last decided QueensJul 2026
Decisions 3,297since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. The judge's 60% approval rate on record since 2016 sits within the 49% to 85% range of the other judges whose most recent office on record is the Queens office. In the latest reporting period, your judge's 62% approval rate compares to the office-wide rate of 76%, the state rate of 62%, and the national rate of 58%. These figures provide a statistical foundation for understanding the judge's recent activity.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 60%
Decisions on record 3,297
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Stacchini Queens National
Approval rate 62% 76% 58%
Fully favorable 56% — —
Denials 38% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Stacchini's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Stacchini
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Michael J. Stacchini has varied across the 3,297 decisions on record since 2016. After an initial period of fluctuation, the rate has remained steady, with the latest period showing a 62% approval rate. This latest figure is consistent with the judge's long-term average on record, suggesting that the judge's approach to evaluating evidence has remained stable.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Stacchini's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Queens hearing office

The Queens hearing office is the judge's most recent office on record as of July 2026. It maintains a bench of 11 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. The office-wide approval rate in the latest period was 76%. You can expect a formal hearing process where the quality of your medical evidence is the primary factor in the outcome.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Queens

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assigned judge is essentially random. There are 11 judges whose most recent office on record is the Queens office. Approval rates among this bench vary significantly, ranging from 49% to 85% on their records since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions