SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Jason P. Tepley

Last decided ColumbusJul 2026
Decisions 1,313since 2023

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. While the office-wide latest-period approval rate is 63%, Jason P. Tepley's latest-period rate is 57%, placing him 6 points below that office benchmark. These figures are derived from a significant volume of decisions, providing a statistical foundation for understanding the local hearing environment. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2023
Approval rate 51%
Decisions on record 1,313
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Tepley Columbus National
Approval rate 57% 63% 58%
Fully favorable 50% — —
Denials 43% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Tepley's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Tepley
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY23FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since January 2023, Jason P. Tepley has issued 1,313 decisions on record. The yearly trend shows a fluctuating pattern, with approval rates moving from 52% in 2023 to 53% in 2024, followed by 44% in 2025 and 57% in the partial 2026 fiscal year. This latest period reflects a continuation of this variable pattern.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Tepley's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Columbus hearing office

Jason P. Tepley's most recent office on record is the Columbus hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. This office serves you and other claimants throughout Ohio and the surrounding region, maintaining a bench of 17 judges. With an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 63%, you can expect a rigorous review of your medical and vocational evidence. See the Columbus Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Columbus

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, 6 of whom decided cases here in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates across this bench range from 34% to 83% on their records. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions