SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Patrick J. Toal

Last decided MilwaukeeSep 2017
Decisions 441since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Evaluating a judge's history requires looking at the broader context of their peers. The 55% approval rate for Patrick J. Toal sits within the 27% to 56% range observed among the 13 judges whose most recent office on record is the Milwaukee hearing office. These figures are based on decisions made since 2016, providing a view of past performance.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 55%
Decisions on record 441

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Toal. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 29, 2017. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Toal's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Toal
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY17
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Patrick J. Toal shifted during the period of 2016 to 2017. In 2016, the judge approved 63% of 348 decisions on record, while in 2017, the approval rate was 44% across 295 decisions. These patterns reflect past activity and help illustrate how a judge's decision-making may evolve over time.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Toal's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Milwaukee hearing office

The Milwaukee hearing office serves you if you are in Wisconsin and the surrounding region. There are 13 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. While the office-wide latest-period approval rate is 51%, your individual outcome depends on the specific medical evidence presented in your file.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Milwaukee

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 13 judges whose most recent office on record is the Milwaukee hearing office, and their approval rates on record since 2016 vary from 27% to 56%.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions