SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Jarrod Tranguch

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,809 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same time period. While Jarrod Tranguch maintains a lifetime approval rate of 41%, your judge's latest-period approval rate is 38%, which sits 7 percentage points below the current Wilkes Barre office average of 45%. These figures are derived from a large docket of 3,809 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 41%
Decisions on record 3,809
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Tranguch Wilkes Barre National
Approval rate 38% 45% 58%
Fully favorable 33%
Denials 62%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Tranguch's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Tranguch
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the decision pattern for Jarrod Tranguch has shown fluctuations. After a period of higher approval rates in 2016 and 2017, the data shows a shift in 2019 and a subsequent low in 2023, followed by a recent stabilization. With 3,809 lifetime decisions on record, these trends reflect the evolving nature of your judge's caseload. The latest period shows a rate of 38%, which represents a continuation of the recent, more moderate approval trend.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Tranguch's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Wilkes Barre hearing office

The Wilkes Barre hearing office serves you throughout the region, operating as a key hub for Pennsylvania disability hearings. The office maintains a bench of 13 judges on record, reflecting a diverse range of decision-making patterns. With a latest-period office-wide approval rate of 45%, you can expect a rigorous review of your medical and vocational evidence. You can see the Wilkes Barre Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. The Wilkes Barre office features 13 judges on record since 2016, with 11 judges currently reporting in the latest period. Across this bench, lifetime approval rates range from 27% to 57%. For your preparation, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions