SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Amy Uren Roberson

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2022
Decisions 1,253 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. While Amy Uren Roberson has a 37% lifetime approval rate, her latest-period rate of 34% sits 12 percentage points below the current 46% average for the Macon hearing office. These figures are derived from a significant volume of cases, providing a statistical foundation for your research. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2022
Approval rate 37%
Decisions on record 1,253
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Roberson Macon National
Approval rate 34% 46% 58%
Fully favorable 25%
Denials 66%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Roberson's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Roberson
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY22FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Amy Uren Roberson has fluctuated over the years, moving from 40% in 2022 to 31% in 2023, 39% in 2024, 40% in 2025, and 34% in the most recent period. This pattern shows variability in annual outcomes across her 1,253 lifetime decisions. The latest period reflects a decline compared to her multi-year average, which may be influenced by changes in the types of cases or the evidence presented in recent hearings.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Roberson's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Macon hearing office

The Macon hearing office serves you throughout the region, operating as a hub for disability adjudications in Georgia. With a bench of 13 judges on record, the office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 46%. You should expect a formal process focused on the medical and vocational evidence supporting your claim. You can see the Macon hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. There are 13 judges on record at this office, with lifetime approval rates ranging from 31% to 72%. Because of this variance, understanding the broader office environment is as important as looking at any single judge. You can view the Macon hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions