SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Amy Uren Roberson

Last decided MaconJul 2026
Decisions 1,253since 2022

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent periods to ensure accuracy. While the judge has a 37% approval rate on record since June 2022, her latest-period approval rate of 34% sits 12 points below the Macon office's latest-period average of 46%. These figures are derived from a docket of 1,253 decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2022
Approval rate 37%
Decisions on record 1,253
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Roberson Macon National
Approval rate 34% 46% 58%
Fully favorable 25% — —
Denials 66% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Roberson's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Roberson
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY22FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Amy Uren Roberson has fluctuated across the 1,253 decisions on record since June 2022. After a 40% approval rate in 2022, the data shows 31% in 2023, 39% in 2024, 40% in 2025, and 34% in 2026. This latest period reflects a continuation of the variance observed throughout your time on record.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Roberson's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Macon hearing office

Amy Uren Roberson's most recent office on record is the Macon hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. This office serves you and other claimants across Georgia. The bench consists of 13 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 46%. You can see the Macon Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Macon

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 13 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, and 7 of them decided cases here in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates across this bench range from 31% to 72% on their respective records. You can review the office-wide trends to understand the broader context of your hearing.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions