SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. William T. Vest Jr.

Last decided NorfolkSep 2019
Decisions 1,341since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. The 48% approval rate for William T. Vest Jr. reflects his total activity on record since 2016, which you can measure against the 48% to 60% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is also Norfolk. Because the SSA assigns cases randomly, these figures provide a baseline for understanding the judicial environment.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 48%
Decisions on record 1,341

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Vest Jr.. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 27, 2019. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Vest Jr.'s docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Vest Jr.
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for William T. Vest Jr. remained steady across his 1,341 decisions on record since 2016. Yearly data shows a consistent pattern, with approval rates of 50% in 2016, 48% in 2017, 49% in 2018, and 45% in 2019. This stability suggests a predictable approach to case evaluation over the period observed.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Vest Jr.'s bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Norfolk hearing office

The Norfolk hearing office serves you throughout the region. Across the bench of 12 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, there is a variety of experience in handling complex disability claims. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on the specific medical evidence you provide.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Norfolk

The SSA uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. At the Norfolk hearing office, there are 12 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with approval rates ranging from 48% to 60% on their since-2016 records. Seven of these judges decided cases here in the SSA's latest file from July 2026.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions