SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. James D. Wascher

Last decided DenverSep 2023
Decisions 1,788since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

When evaluating your chances, it is useful to compare a judge's record against the broader bench. The 22 judges whose most recent office on record is Denver show a wide range of approval rates, spanning from 31% to 75% based on their records since 2016. These figures are derived from a significant volume of cases, providing a baseline for understanding how different adjudicators approach disability claims. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 58%
Decisions on record 1,788

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Wascher. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 29, 2023. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Wascher's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Wascher
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY23
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, your approval rate for James D. Wascher has shown a varied trend. After an initial period of fluctuation, the rate moved through several cycles, reaching a high of 66% in 2017 and a low of 53% in 2021. The most recent full year of data from 2023 shows an approval rate of 56%. This pattern suggests that while the judge's approach has remained relatively consistent, your outcome depends on the specific medical evidence and vocational testimony you present.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Wascher's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Denver hearing office

The Denver hearing office serves you throughout the region, acting as a central hub for disability hearings in Colorado. This office is associated with a bench of 22 judges who manage a high volume of cases. When you appear here, you can expect a formal process focused on the objective medical evidence supporting your claim. You can see the Denver Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Denver

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. At the Denver office, there are 22 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. These judges exhibit a diverse range of approval rates, reflecting the individualized nature of disability adjudication. You can review the full office roster on the Denver hearing office page.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions