SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Edmund C. Werre

Last decided TulsaSep 2016
Decisions 93since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same period to ensure accuracy. The 58% approval rate for Edmund C. Werre reflects his total decisions on record since 2016. This figure sits within the 37% to 81% range observed among the 15 judges whose most recent office on record is the Tulsa hearing office. These aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predicting the outcome of your specific case.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 58%
Decisions on record 93

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Werre. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 30, 2016. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Werre's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Werre
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for Edmund C. Werre spans 93 decisions from January 2016 through September 2016. During this window, the approval rate was 58%. Because this data represents a specific, limited timeframe, it provides a snapshot of past activity. This pattern reflects a consistent approach to case evaluation during the period for which records are available.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Werre's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Tulsa hearing office

Edmund C. Werre's most recent office on record is the Tulsa hearing office, with decisions there through September 2016. This office serves claimants across Oklahoma and is part of a regional network of hearing sites. With 15 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, the bench represents a wide variety of experience levels and decision patterns.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Tulsa

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you draw is essentially random. There are 15 judges whose most recent office on record is the Tulsa hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 37% to 81% on their since-2016 records. For your preparation, the guidance remains consistent regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions