SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Edmund C. Werre

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Tulsa Hearing Office · 1 years on the bench · 837 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Werre?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Werre maintains a lifetime approval rate of 58% based on 837 total decisions. When compared to the latest office average of 64%, his recent decisions show a variance of 6 percentage points. These figures are derived from official Social Security Administration data to provide transparency for your upcoming hearing. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Werre Tulsa National
Approval rate 58% 64% 58%
Fully favorable 49%
Denials 42%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Werre's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Werre
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over his 1 year on the bench, Judge Werre has maintained an approval rate of 58%. This consistency suggests a stable approach to evaluating your disability claim throughout his tenure. While your case outcome depends on specific medical evidence, the data shows a consistent pattern in his decision-making process. This trend reflects a steady application of SSA standards during his time in office.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Werre's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Werre? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Tulsa hearing office

The Tulsa hearing office serves a broad population across Oklahoma, managing a high volume of disability claims. With 6 judges on the bench, the office maintains a latest approval rate of 64%. You can expect a formal hearing process focused on your medical documentation and vocational testimony. You can visit the Tulsa Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your judge is selected randomly. Within the Tulsa office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges range from 38% to 80%. This variance highlights why your case requires a unique strategy regardless of the assigned judge. For preparation purposes, the guidance remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions