SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Matthew Winfrey

Last decided ColumbusJul 2026
Decisions 3,114since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. While the 63% approval rate covers your since-2016 record, the latest-period approval rate is 68%. This latest-period figure sits 5 points above the Columbus office average of 63%, 13 points above the Ohio state average of 55%, and 10 points above the national average of 58%. These figures are derived from a significant volume of cases, providing a stable look at recent trends.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 63%
Decisions on record 3,114
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Winfrey Columbus National
Approval rate 68% 63% 58%
Fully favorable 59% — —
Denials 32% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Winfrey's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Winfrey
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since August 2016, the approval pattern for Matthew Winfrey has shown fluctuations. After a low point in 2018, the rate saw an increase in 2020 before stabilizing in recent years. With 3,114 total decisions on record, the latest-period performance of 68% suggests a steady trend compared to the historical average. This recent data reflects a continuation of an established decision-making pattern.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Winfrey's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Columbus hearing office

Matthew Winfrey's most recent office on record is the Columbus hearing office, which serves claimants across Ohio. This office maintains a bench of 17 judges and reported an office-wide approval rate of 63% in the latest period. You can expect a standard administrative hearing process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Columbus

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is the Columbus hearing office, with 6 of them having decided cases in the latest SSA file. Approval rates among this bench range from 34% to 83% since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions