SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Kathleen Winters

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Toledo OH Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 18,199 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Winters?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Winters holds a 31% lifetime approval rate across 18,199 lifetime decisions. In the most recent reporting period, her approval rate was 20%, which is 27 percentage points below the national average of 58%. These figures provide a statistical snapshot of past activity rather than a guarantee of future outcomes.

Metric Judge Winters Toledo OH National
Approval rate 31% 53% 58%
Fully favorable 18%
Denials 80%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Winters's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Winters
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a decade on the bench, the approval rate for Judge Winters has typically fluctuated between 24% and 38% annually. While her 2025 rate of 20% shows a recent decline, her career-long consistency across 18,199 lifetime decisions suggests a stable approach to case evaluation. This pattern indicates that the judge relies heavily on the specific medical documentation presented in your file.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Winters's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Winters? See if a free benefits review fits your case.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Toledo OH hearing office

The Toledo OH Hearing Office serves you and other claimants across the region, managing a high volume of disability cases. The office maintains an office-wide approval rate of 53%, which provides a baseline for the local bench. You should expect a formal process focused on the rigorous application of Social Security Administration guidelines. You can see the Toledo OH Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to Judge Winters is essentially random. Within the Toledo OH Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the six judges range from 31% to 51%. Because of this variance, the specific judge you draw can influence the statistical probability of your outcome.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions