SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Michelle Wolfe

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,738 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance requires looking at consistent data windows. While Michelle Wolfe has a lifetime approval rate of 28%, the 13 judges at the Wilkes Barre office show a lifetime approval range between 27% and 57%. In the most recent reporting period, Michelle Wolfe's 19% approval rate sits 26 points below the office's 45% average. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 28%
Decisions on record 3,738
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Wolfe Wilkes Barre National
Approval rate 19% 45% 58%
Fully favorable 15%
Denials 81%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Wolfe's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Wolfe
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Michelle Wolfe has presided over 3,738 decisions. Her approval rate has fluctuated over the years, showing a peak of 36% in 2018 before trending toward lower levels in recent periods. The latest 19% approval rate represents a shift from her historical average, which may reflect changes in the types of cases assigned or the evidence presented. This pattern highlights the importance of building a robust medical record to support your claim.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Wolfe's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Wilkes Barre hearing office

The Wilkes Barre hearing office serves claimants across Pennsylvania, managing a high volume of disability cases. The office bench consists of 13 judges on record, with an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 45%. Claimants appearing here should expect a formal process focused on medical documentation and vocational testimony. You can see the /disability-benefits/hearing-offices/wilkes-barre-PA Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Wilkes Barre office currently utilizes 11 judges out of 13 who have served on the bench since 2016. Because the Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, you cannot choose your judge. With an office-wide lifetime approval range of 27% to 57%, the judge you are assigned can vary significantly in their decision history. Preparation remains essential regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions