SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Elias Xenos

Last decided DetroitJul 2026
Decisions 3,363since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. Elias Xenos's 56% approval rate since 2016 sits within the 25% to 75% range of the 12 judges whose most recent office on record is the Detroit hearing office. In the latest reporting period, his 70% approval rate compares to a 57% office average, a 60% state average, and a 58% national average. These figures are based on a significant volume of decisions, providing a broad view of how your case may be evaluated.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 56%
Decisions on record 3,363
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Xenos Detroit National
Approval rate 70% 57% 58%
Fully favorable 57% — —
Denials 30% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Xenos's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Xenos
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Elias Xenos has shown an upward trend since 2016. After starting at 42% in 2017, the rate gradually increased, reaching 70% in the most recent partial fiscal year. This pattern indicates a shift in outcomes over the last decade, with the latest period reflecting a notable increase compared to the long-term average. Such changes often reflect variations in the types of cases heard or the quality of evidence presented in recent hearings.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Xenos's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Detroit hearing office

The Detroit hearing office serves you across Michigan and is a key location for regional disability hearings. With a bench of 12 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, the office maintains an average approval rate of 57% in the latest reporting period. You can expect a standard administrative process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Detroit

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 12 judges whose most recent office on record is the Detroit hearing office. Approval rates among this bench vary from 25% to 75% on their records since 2016. For your preparation, the guidance remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions