SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Robin J. Barber

Last decided KingsportJul 2026
Decisions 3,122since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Evaluating your approval rate requires looking at the broader context of your hearing office. While Robin J. Barber maintains a 44% approval rate since 2016, the bench at this office shows a wide range of outcomes, from 41% to 88%. In the most recent reporting period, Robin J. Barber's 45% approval rate sits 11 points below the office average of 56%. These figures are based on thousands of decisions, providing a stable, data-driven look at past trends.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 44%
Decisions on record 3,122
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Barber Kingsport National
Approval rate 45% 56% 58%
Fully favorable 42% — —
Denials 55% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Barber's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Barber
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since January 2016, Robin J. Barber has issued 3,122 decisions. The yearly approval trend has fluctuated, reaching a high of 54% in 2018 and 38% in 2025. The 2026 fiscal year-to-date rate of 45% shows a shift compared to the previous year. This pattern suggests that while approval rates can shift, your outcome depends on the specific evidence presented in your case.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Barber's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Kingsport hearing office

The Kingsport hearing office serves you and other claimants across Tennessee and the surrounding region. As the judge's most recent office on record as of July 2026, it is home to a bench of 15 judges. The office-wide approval rate in the latest period was 56%, which provides a benchmark for the local hearing environment. You can see the Kingsport Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Kingsport

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 15 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. Because approval rates across this bench vary significantly, from 41% to 88%, understanding the office-wide environment is helpful.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions