SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Charles R. Howard

On record 5,161 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Judge Howard maintains a 63% lifetime approval rate, which falls within the 41% to 88% range seen across the Kingsport bench. In the most recent reporting period, his 65% approval rate outperformed the office average of 56% by 9 percentage points. These figures are based on a docket of 5,161 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 63%
Decisions on record 5,161
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Howard Kingsport National
Approval rate 65% 56% 58%
Fully favorable 60%
Denials 35%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Howard's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Howard
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The decision pattern for Judge Howard has remained relatively steady since 2016. While there have been minor fluctuations in annual approval rates, his record shows a consistent approach to evaluating your disability claim. The latest reporting period shows a 65% approval rate, which aligns with his long-term historical performance. This stability suggests a predictable approach to evidence, though your case is evaluated on its own unique medical and vocational merits.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Howard's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Kingsport hearing office

The Kingsport hearing office serves you throughout the region, operating as a key venue for Social Security disability hearings in Tennessee. The office maintains a bench of 15 judges who manage a high volume of cases to ensure timely processing. With an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 56%, you should focus on building a robust medical record. You can see the Kingsport Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Kingsport hearing office features 15 judges on record since 2016, with 8 currently reporting in the latest SSA data. Because the Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, you cannot choose your judge. Approval rates across this office vary significantly, ranging from 41% to 88% on a lifetime basis. Your preparation remains the same regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions