SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Charles R. Howard

Last decided KingsportJul 2026
Decisions 5,161since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates provides context for how a judge's decisions align with broader trends. Judge Howard's 63% approval rate over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, is measured against the office, state, and national averages for that same period. With 5,161 total decisions on record since 2016, the data offers a look at past patterns.

Last 12 months July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Howard Kingsport National
Approval rate 63% 55% 58%
Fully favorable 58% — —
Denials 37% — —
Decisions 522 — —
All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 63%
Decisions on record 5,161

SSA publishes no office- or national-level breakdown of fully favorable and denial rates. The 12 months are SSA's figures for this fiscal year to date plus the rest of the previous fiscal year; how we calculate them.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Howard's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Howard
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Judge Howard has issued 5,161 decisions. The approval rate has fluctuated over this period, with yearly figures ranging from 58% to 67%. The most recent 12 months show an approval rate of 63%, which sits above the 63% average recorded since 2016.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Howard's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Kingsport hearing office

Charles R. Howard's most recent office on record is the Kingsport Hearing Office, with decisions there through July 2026. This office maintains a bench of 15 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. The office recorded a 55% approval rate over the 12 months to July 31, 2026. You can find more information on the Kingsport Hearing Office page.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Kingsport

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Among the 8 judges who decided cases here in SSA's latest file, approval rates range from 31% to 78% over the 12 months to July 31, 2026. There are 15 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, 8 of whom decided cases here in SSA's latest file.

Judges with similar approval rates

These active judges' approval rates over the same 12 months (July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026) are closest to Judge Howard's 63%. All five last decided cases in Tennessee.

Rates within 5 points of each other are hard to tell apart at a typical caseload, so treat these as judges with comparable records, not a ranking. See Judge Howard and the three closest side by side →

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions