SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Harold D. Davis

On record 4,055 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent data sets, specifically the judge's lifetime record against the broader office-wide lifetime range of 47% to 79%. With 4,055 decisions on record, the data provides a clear view of how this judge has historically approached disability claims. This volume of cases allows for a stable understanding of the judge's record compared to the office bench. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 66%
Decisions on record 4,055

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Davis. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 26, 2025. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Davis's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Davis
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, your approval rate for Harold D. Davis has shown a notable upward trajectory. While the early years of the record saw approval rates in the mid-50% range, the trend shifted significantly starting in 2019, with recent years frequently exceeding 70%. This pattern suggests a shift in the judge's approach to evidence or the types of cases presented. The latest period reflects a continuation of this steady pattern, indicating that the judge's current decision-making process is well-established.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Davis's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Fort Smith hearing office

The Fort Smith hearing office serves you throughout the region, maintaining a bench of 8 judges on record. You can expect a standard administrative process focused on the medical and vocational evidence of your disability. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 61%. You can see the Fort Smith Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The SSA utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. There are 8 judges on record at this office since 2016, 3 of whom reported in the SSA's latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary widely, spanning from 47% to 79% over their respective lifetimes. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions