SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Harold D. Davis

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Fort Smith Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 25,290 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Davis?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Davis maintains a lifetime approval rate of 66%, which is higher than the current 59% approval rate at the Fort Smith Hearing Office and the 58% national average. This data is derived from a career docket of 25,290 lifetime decisions, providing a statistical baseline for understanding his judicial history. Aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predicting the outcome of your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Davis Fort Smith National
Approval rate 66% 59% 58%
Fully favorable 76%
Denials 24%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Davis's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Davis
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over his 10 years on the bench, Judge Davis has shown an upward trend in approval rates. After starting in the mid-50% range, his decisions shifted significantly starting in 2019, consistently remaining above 67% in recent years. The latest reporting period shows an approval rate of 76%, which is 7 points higher than the office average. This recent uptick reflects a steady pattern of decision-making that has remained consistent throughout the last several years.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Davis's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Davis? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Fort Smith hearing office

The Fort Smith Hearing Office serves you throughout the region, managing a volume of disability cases with a team of 6 administrative law judges. The office currently reports an approval rate of 59%, which serves as a benchmark for the local bench. You can expect a professional environment focused on the thorough review of your medical evidence. You can see the Fort Smith Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Across the 6 judges at the Fort Smith Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates vary, ranging from 46% to 66%. Because of this variance, understanding the general environment of the office is helpful for your claim. You can find more information on the Fort Smith Hearing Office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions