SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Bill Jones

On record 4,884 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rates for Bill Jones reflect a consistent record within the Fort Smith hearing office. Across his 4,884 lifetime decisions, he has maintained a 55% approval rate, which sits within the office-wide lifetime range of 47% to 79%. In the most recent reporting period, his 56% approval rate compares to a 61% average for the office, a 47% state average, and a 58% national average. These figures provide a snapshot of recent activity rather than a forecast for your hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 55%
Decisions on record 4,884
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Jones Fort Smith National
Approval rate 56% 61% 58%
Fully favorable 51%
Denials 44%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Jones's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Jones
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the decision pattern for Bill Jones has shown shifts, moving from a 52% approval rate in his first year to 56% in the most recent period. This trend indicates a return toward his long-term average following a peak in 2023. These fluctuations often reflect changes in the volume of cases or the specific medical evidence presented in your and other cases.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Jones's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Fort Smith hearing office

The Fort Smith hearing office serves claimants throughout Arkansas and the surrounding region. With 8 judges on record, the office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 61%. You can expect a professional environment focused on the medical and vocational evidence of your disability claim. For more information, visit the Fort Smith hearing office page to view the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you draw is essentially random. There are 8 judges on record at this office since 2016, 3 of whom reported in the latest SSA period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 47% to 79% over their respective careers. Your preparation remains the same regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions