SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Bill Jones

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Fort Smith Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 27,626 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Jones?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's lifetime performance against recent office and national benchmarks provides context for your upcoming hearing. With 27,626 lifetime decisions, the data for Judge Jones offers a look at his history. While his latest approval rate of 60% sits near the national average, these figures represent historical trends rather than predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Jones Fort Smith National
Approval rate 55% 59% 58%
Fully favorable 53%
Denials 40%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Jones's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Jones
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over his 10-year tenure, Judge Jones has shown a varied approval pattern, with a notable increase in favorable outcomes starting in 2023. After a period of lower approval rates around 2021, the recent trend reflects a shift toward higher allowance percentages. This pattern suggests that the judge's current approach may be influenced by evolving case evidence or shifts in the types of claims being heard.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Jones's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Jones? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Fort Smith hearing office

The Fort Smith Hearing Office serves you across Arkansas and the surrounding region, managing a volume of disability appeals. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains a process for evaluating medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can expect a standard administrative hearing process designed to determine your eligibility under federal guidelines. You can see the Fort Smith Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Across the 6 judges at the Fort Smith Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates range from 46% to 66%. Because of this variance, understanding the office-wide environment is as important as looking at your specific judge.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions