SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Elisabeth McGee

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Fort Smith Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 22,113 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge McGee?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge McGee maintains a lifetime approval rate of 53% based on 22,113 decisions. In the most recent reporting period, her 54% approval rate tracks 5 points below the national average of 58% and 6 points below the current Fort Smith office average of 59%. These figures provide a statistical baseline for understanding how cases have been decided in her courtroom over the last decade.

Metric Judge McGee Fort Smith National
Approval rate 53% 59% 58%
Fully favorable 45%
Denials 46%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge McGee's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge McGee
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over 10 years on the bench, your judge has seen approval rates shift from the mid-40s in her early years to a peak of 66% in 2024, before settling at 55% in 2025. This trajectory reflects the complex nature of disability adjudication where case mix and evidentiary standards fluctuate annually. The recent data indicates a return toward her long-term average after a period of higher approvals.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge McGee's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge McGee? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Fort Smith hearing office

The Fort Smith Hearing Office serves you and other claimants across Arkansas and parts of the surrounding region. It is staffed by a team of judges who manage a high volume of disability appeals annually. The office currently maintains an approval rate of 59%, which serves as a benchmark for the local administrative environment.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning you cannot request a specific judge. Across the Fort Smith bench, lifetime approval rates for the six presiding judges range from 46% to 66%. This variance highlights why understanding the local judicial environment is useful, even though the core requirements for proving disability remain consistent.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions